I don't think NET has less bias than RPI at all. RPI was pretty much straight arithmetic. Then they improved it by weighting H/A differently as well. Where the NET lost me was when they revealed that one of the major components was the super-secret TVI, and I think that's where the bias lies but no one can prove it.
The quads are still just an arbitrary line drawn through the rankings that they'll discard as soon as beating VCU is better than beating Duke - which right now it is. They also don't value high ranking in conference victories when your conference is an A10 vs. being in a P5 (see 2016). The committee hasn't changed their approach, they just got a computer ranking they like using better. At the end of the day they will yap about the eye test, which might as well be called "name on the jersey" test, when they have to decide between a Bonaventure or a - blows brains out - 10th team from the Big Ten.