1. Thank you for visiting A10Talk.com! We encourage you to sign up and join the conversation. Our forum system is cutting edge with many benefits:

    1) It's FREE! 2) iPhone / Android access using Tapatalk app. 3) Sign in with Facebook. 4) Facebook-style Notification system and Activity Stream.

Predicting the entire A-10 conference season

Discussion in 'General A-10 Discussion' started by Natty, Jul 3, 2012.

  1. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
  2. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    And let me just say, looking at my breakdown...I could see St. Joe's winning one or two of those tough A-10 roadies, and Xavier losing one or two of those tough home contests. I think you could easily switch any of the top 6, maybe even top 7.
  3. Offline

    DistrictBaller Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    140
    Likes Received:
    38
    I'm going to say you are severely underestimating St. Bonaventure and how tough it is to get a W at the Reilly Center. I could see VCU taking a L there. A lot of good teams go in there and lose.
  4. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    You're might be right, but I don't see them doing any better than 8-8 (so I guess not too severe).

    I think losing Nicholson the year two TOUGH VCU and Butler teams join isn't going to help the Bonnies. Da'Quan Cook also graduates, so that's two of their top three scorers they have to replace.

    I just think their in for a bit of a dip, and I think predicting they'll win 4 less games after losing a 1st-round draft pick who did it all for them + the VCU/Butler thing, makes that 4-game deep seem pretty accurate from my perspective.
  5. Offline

    Bill Russell Member

    Member Since:
    May 23, 2012
    Message Count:
    58
    Likes Received:
    4
    Team:
    St. Bonaventure
    Replacing Cook won't be an issue for Bona. He wouldn't have started most of last season if not for the season-ending injury to Marquise Simmons, who is a far more gifted offensive player and rebounder. Cook, though, was a strong defender and gritty junk yard dog. Losing Nicholson will surely lead to many prognosticators forecasting a fall off for SBU, but I don't see as drastic a dip as many. Somewhere between 9-7 and 7-9 is my guess this season, as there is a lot of experience and athleticism returning. The big difference is that this team is finally going to be able to run and guys like Charlon Kloof, Demitrius Conger, and Youssou Ndoye will greatly benefit from that.

    Also, I have a great deal of respect for Duquesne, but there is almost no way they finish that high. They weren't very good last year AND lost three of their best players. Add that to a new coach and a massively turned over roster and they would seem to have the basement written all over them. For a team that had so few weapons up front to lose their best guards/wings is not a recipe for success in the short term. Simply put, I'd be surprised if the Dukes won more than three conference games.

    Edit: Also, remember the home/home opponents will affect the standings greatly. Teams that have FU, DU, and URI (for this season) will have a definite advantage.
    DistrictBaller likes this.
  6. Offline

    Flyer75 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    13
    Likes Received:
    1
    Team:
    Dayton
    Two things I'll bet won't happen that you predicted. One, 7 teams finishing 10-6 or better. No way that happens. The bottom half isn't bad enough for that to happen. We didn't have 7 teams finish with that type of record last year and the league is MUCH tougher this season. Two, X going 12-4. Traditionally, that's a given, but with with 3 freshmen or sophomores starting at the 1, 2, 3 spot in a HEAVY guard league, that will be tough.

    I don't necessarily disagree with a UD 10-6 record...I just gotta think 10-6 is good for at least 4th place this year (it was good for 3rd last season).
  7. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    I agree on the Xavier thing. After doing this initially I could see them dropping a homer (or two) to VCU, Dayton or Temple, and possibly a roadie at Richmond. But with that said I could also see them pulling out a W or two at Butler, Dayton or St. Joe's.

    Looking at their schedule last year, their six losses were @La Salle, @Dayton, @Temple, @UMass, @St. Louis, and at home against St. Louis. While they do lose some talent, Xavier has a tendency to reload, and their road schedule is just a lot more manageable this year. They've been pretty effective at protecting their own house.
    Flyer75 likes this.
  8. Offline

    XUgrad86 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 16, 2012
    Message Count:
    9
    Likes Received:
    2
    Team:
    Xavier
    I enjoy Dayton fans selling Xavier short. Talent wins. The schedule that Xavier plays is very, very favorable. I actually don't think Butler will do as well as projected. They have some young talent but it's a new league for them and there is usually a learning curve. They are another year away. It's gonna be an exciting year no matter who wins.
  9. Offline

    Flyer75 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    13
    Likes Received:
    1
    Team:
    Dayton
    Not selling X short. I just don't think they'll go 12-4. I don't think but maybe one team will, two at the most and it will probably win the league. I'm not gonna bet on a team in this league with the guards that are all over the place that X can go 12-4 with one proven player (Wells) out there. If Robinson and Taylor improve dramatically, I'll eat my crow. Even many of your own fans agree with me on this.
  10. Offline

    SpiderInTheMixingBowl Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    153
    Likes Received:
    17
    Team:
    Richmond (U of R)
    Duquesne is way too high.

    GW is way too low.
  11. Offline

    Xtreme New Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    22
    Likes Received:
    9
    X will have a lot of talent on the floor. They could play 10-12 guys. Semaj might be better than Wells. Don't know. I do know come conf time, they'll all be veterans. We'll be faster down the floor and very, very quick. 12-4 is probably a stretch. To tell you the truth, I have no idea, but they'll be a blast to watch. Defense will be the key as always.
  12. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    Where do you have both? 1-16?
  13. Offline

    Bill Russell Member

    Member Since:
    May 23, 2012
    Message Count:
    58
    Likes Received:
    4
    Team:
    St. Bonaventure
    I'd say GW will be much better than 2-14. Beyond the top and bottom one or two, I see a major log jam from there. Teams who could really struggle this year would seem to include FU, URI, and the Dukes. Rhody will obviously be making a move upward once Hurley's guys get in, but that's one thin roster for 2012-13. Fordham could make a step up from the basement, though. Those young guards have a bright future. The frontcourt lacks bulk and experience, though. As far as the Dukes go, I said earlier in this thread that they seem to have an uphill battle. That roster doesn't look A-10 caliber this season, though the Winters kid sounds promising. When a guy of Sean Johnson's caliber is your go-to guy, things tend not to go so well. Trust me, I've been through it (see: Ahmad Smith with the Bonnies in 2005-2006).
  14. Offline

    aceFU93 Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    94
    Likes Received:
    13
    Team:
    Fordham
    Fordham will play a 3 guard offense. Up front they'll have Chris Gaston who was 2nd team last season, so there is some experience there. They also have Ryan Canty returning who is a 6'9" 230 lb. center.

    They signed Leonard, a 6'8", 285-pound forward/center and Ryan Rhoomes, a 6'9", 210-pound, forward who initially committed to TCU.

    Thats some decent experience and size in my view.
  15. Offline

    Bill Russell Member

    Member Since:
    May 23, 2012
    Message Count:
    58
    Likes Received:
    4
    Team:
    St. Bonaventure
    Jesus of Nazareth... do you believe I totally forgot about Gaston? Unacceptable. My apologies. Fordham could definitely take a step forward this season, as those young guards showed some flashes last season.
  16. Offline

    gmoser1210 Moderator

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2012
    Message Count:
    187
    Likes Received:
    22
    Team:
    Butler
    In the blog, you have SLU losing at Butler and winning at Butler. Which is it?
  17. Offline

    gmoser1210 Moderator

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2012
    Message Count:
    187
    Likes Received:
    22
    Team:
    Butler
    Here's my completely uneducated, unreliable, ignorant, improbable, and completely un-unbiased guess:

    1. SAINT LOUIS (13-3)
    Home - BU, CHA, UD, LAS, UM, URI, SJU, VCU
    Away - BU, DUQ, FOR, GW, UR, SBU, TU, XU

    2. BUTLER (11-5)
    Home - CHA, DUQ, URI, UR, SBU, SLU, TU, XU
    Away - UD, FOR, GW, LAS, UM, SJU, SLU, VCU

    2. SAINT JOSEPH’S (11-5)
    Home - BU, FOR, GW, URI, UR, SBU, TU, XU
    Away - CHA, UD, DUQ, FOR, LAS, UM, SLU, VCU

    4. VCU (10-6)
    Home - BU, UD, FOR, GW, LAS, UM, UR, SJU
    Away - CHA, DUQ, URI, UR, SBU, SLU, TU, XU

    4. XAVIER (10-6)
    Home - UD, FOR, GW, LAS, UM, SLU, TU, VCU
    Away - BU, CHA, UD, DUQ, URI, UR, SBU, SJU

    4. TEMPLE (10-6)
    Home - CHA, DUQ, LAS, URI, UR, SBU, SLU, VCU
    Away - BU, CHA, UD, FOR, GW, UM, SJU, XU

    7. MASSACHUSETTS (9-7)
    Home - BU, UD, DUQ, GW, URI, UR, SJU, TU
    Away - CHA, FOR, LAS, URI, SBU, SLU, VCU, XU

    8. DAYTON (8-8)
    Home - BU, DUQ, FOR, UR, SBU, SJU, TU, XU
    Away - CHA, GW, LAS, UM, URI, SLU, VCU, XU

    8. ST. BONAVENTURE (8-8)
    Home - CHA, DUQ, FOR, LAS, UM, SLU, VCU, XU
    Away - BU, UD, DUQ, GW, URI, UR,SJU, TU

    10. RICHMOND (7-9)
    Home - CHA, DUQ, GW, URI, SBU, SLU,VCU, XU
    Away - BU, UD, FOR, LAS, UM, SJU, TU, VCU

    10. LA SALLE (7-9)
    Home - BU, UD, DUQ, FOR, GW, UM, UR, SJU
    Away - CHA, GW, URI, SBU, SLU, TU, VCU, XU

    12. DUQUESNE (6-10)
    Home - CHA, GW, URI, SBU, SJU, SLU, VCU, XU
    Away BU, UD,FOR, LAS, UM, UR, SBU, TU

    12. FORDHAM (6-10)
    Home - BU, DUQ, UM, URI, UR, SJU, SLU, TU
    Away - CHA, UD, GW, LAS, SBU, SJU, VCU, XU

    14. GEORGE WASHINGTON (5-11)
    Home - BU, CHA, UD, FOR, LAS, SBU, SLU, TU
    Away - DUQ, LAS, UM, URI, UR, SJU, VCU, XU

    15. CHARLOTTE (3-13)
    Home - UD, FOR, LAS, UM, SJU, TU, XU, VCU
    Away - BU, DUQ, GW, URI, UR, SBU, SLU, TU

    15. RHODE ISLAND (3-13)
    Home - CHA, UD, GW, LAS, UM, SBU, VCU, XU
    Away - BU, DUQ, FOR, UM, UR, SJU, SLU, TU
  18. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    In my blog I put a disclaimer that addresses those. The idea being there are a lot of toss-up games, and that my rankings were just meant to be a general idea of around how I think the teams will do. A rough estimate of how the final standings will shake out, if you will.
  19. Offline

    gmoser1210 Moderator

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2012
    Message Count:
    187
    Likes Received:
    22
    Team:
    Butler
    I see. I forgot about reading that when I went back to look at it a second time.
  20. Offline

    Natty Administrator

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2012
    Message Count:
    249
    Likes Received:
    39
    I actually got a ton of messages like that. That's how we do things these days though, rush through, skim, and usually miss something (I'm guilty of it as well).

Share This Page